Michael B. Silverstein
Senior Managing Associate
He / Him / His
Overview
Michael is many things: an obsessive nerd, a former theatre kid, and a genuine person. As a trial and appellate litigator, he brings all of this to the table in the world of high-stakes, bet-the-company litigation.
Obsessive Nerd: Michael homes in on what cases are truly about. Every case is an intellectual problem, and he lives it until it’s solved. This obsession lets him take cases that some might think are dead in the water and transform them into winners for his clients through unique arguments and tactics.
Michael has proved this time and time again in his career. He did it when winning a significant class-certification victory in a unique competitor-based false-advertising case seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. Michael crafted summary-judgment arguments on a rarely interpreted state statute that won the case on the eve of trial. And he’s used summary-judgment briefing to flip cases of alleged willful copyright infringement on their head to leverage favorable settlement.
Former Theatre Kid: Before becoming an attorney, Michael harbored hopes of working in theatre. He still bears the scars from those days in the form of a still-shattered thumbnail from breaking his thumb during a sword fight (ask him about it). But he takes these theatre skills and applies them to the standup components of advocacy.
Whether Michael is arguing in trial and appellate courts, or deposing witnesses and plaintiffs, he brings an engaging, atypical-for-a-lawyer energy to arguments and examinations. This style cuts out the legalese so that he can get down to brass tacks with the Court and the witnesses.
A Genuine Person: What separates Michael is not just his accomplishments, but his style and his values. The legal world is full of over-the-top, unnecessary formalism. He rejects these archaic notions as incompatible with the modern world and modern problems clients face.
Michael also lets this guide his values. He maintains an active pro bono practice. As a member of the Sixth Circuit’s CJA Panel, Michael represents individuals who cannot afford counsel in their criminal and habeas appeals. He has also authored amicus briefs in state Supreme Courts, one of which convinced the Ohio Supreme Court to rectify issues in its postconviction proceedings under constitutional standards.*
***
At bottom, Michael works tirelessly for his clients using all his unique skills to win.
*Matter completed prior to joining Benesch.
Experience
Represented a national retailer before the Washington Supreme Court in a class action challenging reference prices in product markdowns. The team successfully argued that alleging a false reference price does not satisfy the injury requirement under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act, setting precedent that significantly limits retailer exposure to similar claims.
As special counsel to the Ohio Attorney General, and lead private counsel for Ohio University, won a complete defense victory for Ohio University in a case stemming from the death of a student at an off-campus property. Set statewide precedent regarding statutory duties, as well as wrongful death and negligence claims owed by schools and universities.
Defeated class certification and prevailed on Daubert arguments dismissing the opinions of class plaintiffs’ damages and consumer survey experts, successfully arguing on behalf of telehealth company that plaintiffs’ claims involved too many individualized questions regarding injury and damages, rendering class treatment inappropriate.
No results found
Credentials
Education
- Order of the Coif
- CALI Award for Highest Grade in Contracts, Legislation & Regulation, Constitutional Law, International Law, Legal Writing III, Civil Rights, and Criminal Procedure I
- Symposium Editor, Case Western Reserve Law Review, Volume 68
Bar & Court Admissions
More
- Listed, Ohio Super Lawyers – Rising Stars, 2025
Related News & Insights
Five Stars, Zero Tolerance: FTC Turns Up Enforcement Under Consumer Review Rule
The Federal Trade Commission has made one point decidedly clear: the Consumer Review and Testimonials Rule is not a background compliance issue—it is an active enforcement priority.
What’s in a Name?: Courts Refuse to Stretch Product Names into Promises
Courts are making clear that a consumer’s subjective interpretation of a product’s name isn’t enough to support a false-advertising claim. Instead, those claims fail unless the seller made a statement that would mislead a reasonable consumer.
Benesch Secures Major Victory for Retailers in the Washington Supreme Court
Benesch secured a significant victory in the Washington Supreme Court for retailers and e-commerce businesses facing class-action litigation under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act (CPA).
48 Benesch Attorneys Selected to 2026 Ohio Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
Benesch is pleased to announce that 17 attorneys have been selected by their legal community peers to the 2026 Ohio …